PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CYH.TOCUD.TO
YTD Return16.15%13.71%
1Y Return27.82%25.54%
3Y Return (Ann)6.49%3.06%
5Y Return (Ann)5.40%5.73%
10Y Return (Ann)6.10%7.60%
Sharpe Ratio2.572.39
Sortino Ratio3.673.39
Omega Ratio1.471.43
Calmar Ratio2.201.59
Martin Ratio17.1013.56
Ulcer Index1.60%1.82%
Daily Std Dev10.65%10.31%
Max Drawdown-61.47%-38.36%
Current Drawdown-0.77%-1.66%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CYH.TO and CUD.TO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than CUD.TO's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CYH.TO has underperformed CUD.TO with an annualized return of 6.10%, while CUD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
127.67%
169.38%
CYH.TO
CUD.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CYH.TO and CUD.TO have an expense ratio of 0.66%.


CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
Expense ratio chart for CYH.TO: current value at 0.66% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%
Expense ratio chart for CUD.TO: current value at 0.66% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYH.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CYH.TO, currently valued at 12.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.00
CUD.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 8.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.96

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYH.TO and CUD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.02
1.80
CYH.TO
CUD.TO

Dividends

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than CUD.TO's 1.84% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.23%4.72%4.76%3.92%4.54%4.04%4.02%3.05%3.42%3.87%3.33%25.06%
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.84%2.05%1.92%2.07%2.14%1.73%2.14%1.51%1.85%1.80%4.72%1.75%

Drawdowns

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.47%, which is greater than CUD.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and CUD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.74%
-5.33%
CYH.TO
CUD.TO

Volatility

CYH.TO vs. CUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) at 3.33%. This indicates that CYH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.70%
3.33%
CYH.TO
CUD.TO