CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO).
CYH.TO and XDG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CYH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jan 15, 2008. XDG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 7, 2017. Both CYH.TO and XDG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CYH.TO or XDG.TO.
Key characteristics
| CYH.TO | XDG.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.11% | 17.41% |
| 1Y Return | 25.64% | 21.74% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.01% | 9.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.27% | 8.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.38 | 2.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.42 | 4.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.14 | 5.57 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.87 | 18.04 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.60% | 1.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.67% | 7.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.47% | -27.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.66% | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYH.TO and XDG.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDG.TO's 17.41% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYH.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XDG.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than XDG.TO's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYH.TO iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.27% | 4.72% | 4.76% | 3.92% | 4.54% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 3.05% | 3.42% | 3.87% | 3.33% | 25.06% |
XDG.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.83% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 3.18% | 3.47% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.47%, which is greater than XDG.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and XDG.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDG.TO) at 2.59%. This indicates that CYH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.