GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F
GBPUSD=X (GBP/USD) is a currency, while CL=F (Crude Oil WTI) is an asset. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBPUSD=X
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- -1.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.03%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- -0.52%
CL=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPUSD=X GBP/USD | -0.45% | 7.55% | -1.67% | 5.28% | -9.72% |
CL=F Crude Oil WTI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBPUSD=X and CL=F is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F — Risk / Return Rank
GBPUSD=X
CL=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBPUSD=X | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBPUSD=X | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.44% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.18% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility
GBPUSD=X vs. CL=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBPUSD=X | CL=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.25% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.09% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBPUSD=X and CL=F have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GBPUSD=X and CL=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer