PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL=F vs. SLB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CL=FSLB
YTD Return11.74%-6.10%
1Y Return11.41%10.54%
3Y Return (Ann)6.02%15.71%
5Y Return (Ann)4.26%7.35%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.14%-4.45%
Sharpe Ratio0.260.42
Daily Std Dev27.48%27.12%
Max Drawdown-93.11%-87.63%
Current Drawdown-44.90%-46.17%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CL=F and SLB is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CL=F vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly higher than SLB's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CL=F has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of -2.14%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -4.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
172.31%
1,319.81%
CL=F
SLB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crude Oil WTI

Schlumberger Limited

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL=F vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.500.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.001.002.000.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.48
SLB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLB, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.50-0.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLB, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market0.001.002.00-0.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLB, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.300.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLB, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.00-0.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLB, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.00-0.95

CL=F vs. SLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the SLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL=F and SLB.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.26
-0.59
CL=F
SLB

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -93.11%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and SLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-44.90%
-46.17%
CL=F
SLB

Volatility

CL=F vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison

Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 4.46%. This indicates that CL=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.26%
4.46%
CL=F
SLB