CL=F vs. CVX
CL=F (Crude Oil WTI) is an asset, while CVX (Chevron Corporation) is a stock. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CL=F vs. CVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CL=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- YTD
- 21.82%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 17.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
CL=F vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL=F Crude Oil WTI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.11% |
CVX Chevron Corporation | 21.82% | 10.10% | 1.29% | -13.63% | 42.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL=F and CVX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL=F vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank
CL=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVX
CL=F vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL=F | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL=F vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL=F | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.92% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.40% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.36% | — |
Volatility
CL=F vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL=F | CVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.79% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.21% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 29.24% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
CL=F and CVX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CL=F and CVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer