CL=F vs. CVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CL=F (Crude Oil WTI) is an asset, while CVX (Chevron Corporation) is a stock. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CL=F vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CL=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -8.07%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 19.15%
• 1Y: 24.85%
• 3Y*: 9.68%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CL=F vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CL=F Crude Oil WTI	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	18.11%
CVX Chevron Corporation	17.66%	10.10%	1.29%	-13.63%	42.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CL=F and CVX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	0.11

Return for Risk

CL=F vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CVX

CVX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL=F vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CL=F	CVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.47	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.06	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CL=F	CVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-55.77%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-15.89%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.39%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CL=F	CVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.47%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	25.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.19%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CL=F and CVX in my portfolio?

CL=F and CVX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.