PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL=F vs. NQ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CL=F and NQ=F is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CL=F vs. NQ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-16.07%
6.38%
CL=F
NQ=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CL=F:

-0.45

NQ=F:

1.40

Sortino Ratio

CL=F:

-0.47

NQ=F:

1.91

Omega Ratio

CL=F:

0.94

NQ=F:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

CL=F:

-0.23

NQ=F:

1.75

Martin Ratio

CL=F:

-0.96

NQ=F:

5.95

Ulcer Index

CL=F:

13.07%

NQ=F:

4.14%

Daily Std Dev

CL=F:

27.61%

NQ=F:

17.37%

Max Drawdown

CL=F:

-93.11%

NQ=F:

-35.28%

Current Drawdown

CL=F:

-52.53%

NQ=F:

-4.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than NQ=F's 23.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CL=F has underperformed NQ=F with an annualized return of 1.97%, while NQ=F has yielded a comparatively higher 17.00% annualized return.


CL=F

YTD

-3.74%

1M

-0.61%

6M

-16.06%

1Y

-7.07%

5Y*

2.36%

10Y*

1.97%

NQ=F

YTD

23.50%

1M

1.24%

6M

6.38%

1Y

25.40%

5Y*

18.75%

10Y*

17.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL=F vs. NQ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL=F, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.50-0.331.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL=F, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.50-0.291.75
The chart of Omega ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.300.971.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL=F, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.00-0.191.56
The chart of Martin ratio for CL=F, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.695.22
CL=F
NQ=F

The current CL=F Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the NQ=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL=F and NQ=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.33
1.27
CL=F
NQ=F

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. NQ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -93.11%, which is greater than NQ=F's maximum drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and NQ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-44.24%
-4.91%
CL=F
NQ=F

Volatility

CL=F vs. NQ=F - Volatility Comparison

Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to E-Mini Nasdaq 100 Futures (NQ=F) at 5.22%. This indicates that CL=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.73%
5.22%
CL=F
NQ=F
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab