PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPUSD=X achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FCPT's 13.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GBPUSD=X has underperformed FCPT with an annualized return of 0.29%, while FCPT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.


GBPUSD=X

1D
0.17%
1M
0.82%
6M
-1.78%
YTD
-0.04%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
1.83%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*
0.29%
ALL TIME*
-2.16%

FCPT

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.72%
6M
6.33%
YTD
13.02%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
6.84%
ALL TIME*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.12M$18.57M$20.94M

GBPUSD=X

GBP/USD
$385.56K$376.56K$355.21K

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBPUSD=X
GBP/USD
-0.04%7.55%-1.67%5.28%-10.69%-0.91%3.06%4.01%-5.66%9.52%
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
13.02%-10.14%13.14%3.10%-7.20%3.42%12.37%12.21%5.54%30.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPUSD=X and FCPT is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.12

The correlation between GBPUSD=X and FCPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GBPUSD=X
GBPUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPT
FCPT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.06

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.42

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

0.96

-0.58

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the FCPT Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPUSD=X and FCPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPUSD=X drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, smaller than the maximum FCPT drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPUSD=X and FCPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.29%

-57.60%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.89%

-11.04%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-20.22%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-25.96%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.46%

-57.60%

+32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.17%

-7.73%

-28.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.49%

-8.27%

-23.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.80%

-2.16%

Volatility

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) is 1.91%, while Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that GBPUSD=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

6.99%

-5.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

14.66%

-10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.17%

18.08%

-11.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

20.04%

-11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.54%

30.81%

-22.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPUSD=X and FCPT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPT has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to GBPUSD=X (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBPUSD=X dropped -49.29% vs FCPT's -57.60%.

FCPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPUSD=X and FCPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer