PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPUSD=X achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FCPT's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GBPUSD=X has underperformed FCPT with an annualized return of -0.02%, while FCPT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


GBPUSD=X

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-2.33%
1Y
-3.43%
3Y*
1.25%
5Y*
-1.00%
10Y*
-0.02%

FCPT

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
10.19%
6M
10.21%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBPUSD=X
GBP/USD
-1.95%7.55%-1.67%5.28%-10.69%-0.91%3.06%4.01%-5.66%9.52%
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
10.19%-10.14%13.14%3.10%-7.20%3.42%12.37%12.21%5.54%30.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPUSD=X and FCPT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPUSD=X
GBPUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPT
FCPT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.00

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.10

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.20

-0.78

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the FCPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPUSD=X and FCPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPUSD=X drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, smaller than the maximum FCPT drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPUSD=X and FCPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.29%

-57.60%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-14.54%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-23.97%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-25.96%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.46%

-57.60%

+32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.39%

-10.04%

-27.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-8.28%

-22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

7.44%

-4.74%

Volatility

GBPUSD=X vs. FCPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) is 1.68%, while Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that GBPUSD=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPUSD=XFCPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

6.75%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

13.20%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

17.49%

-11.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.23%

19.92%

-11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.71%

30.76%

-22.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPUSD=X and FCPT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPT has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to GBPUSD=X (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBPUSD=X dropped -49.29% vs FCPT's -57.60%.

FCPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPUSD=X and FCPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer