PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL=F vs. BZ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CL=FBZ=F
YTD Return11.74%9.01%
1Y Return11.41%10.70%
3Y Return (Ann)6.02%6.59%
5Y Return (Ann)4.26%2.95%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.14%-2.56%
Sharpe Ratio0.260.52
Daily Std Dev27.48%26.52%
Max Drawdown-93.11%-86.77%
Current Drawdown-44.90%-42.51%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CL=F and BZ=F is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CL=F vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL=F achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly higher than BZ=F's 9.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CL=F has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of -2.14%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower -2.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
98.17%
109.17%
CL=F
BZ=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Crude Oil WTI

Crude Oil Brent

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL=F vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.500.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market0.001.002.000.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL=F, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.42
BZ=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.500.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.001.002.000.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.48

CL=F vs. BZ=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL=F and BZ=F.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.24
0.23
CL=F
BZ=F

Drawdowns

CL=F vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL=F drawdown since its inception was -93.11%, which is greater than BZ=F's maximum drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL=F and BZ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-44.90%
-42.51%
CL=F
BZ=F

Volatility

CL=F vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) is 5.20%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that CL=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.20%
6.09%
CL=F
BZ=F