GAVA vs. BTCZ
GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. GAVA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GAVA
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.56%
- 1M
- 60.49%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 53.41%
- 1Y
- 60.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -18.74% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 13.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAVA and BTCZ is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAVA vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
GAVA
BTCZ
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -0.55 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAVA drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAVA and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.10% | -91.06% | +66.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.10% | -77.44% | +53.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -73.73% | +64.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.76% | — |
Volatility
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.58% | 87.54% | -37.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 97.10% | -47.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 97.10% | -47.52% |
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAVA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAVA vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
GAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAVA and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for GAVA.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAVA and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for GAVA and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer