BTCZ vs. ARKB
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCZ is actively managed, while ARKB is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCZ returned 42.88% vs -35.86% for ARKB. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ARKB.
Performance
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 25.89% return, which is significantly higher than ARKB's -23.24% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 11.93%
- 1M
- 32.84%
- YTD
- 25.89%
- 6M
- 33.36%
- 1Y
- 42.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB
- 1D
- -5.99%
- 1M
- -14.34%
- YTD
- -23.24%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 25.89% | -29.11% | -76.58% |
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -23.24% | -6.59% | 62.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and ARKB is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -1.00 |
The correlation between BTCZ and ARKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. ARKB — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
ARKB
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCZ | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | -0.83 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | -1.10 | +2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.88 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.73 | +1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | -1.27 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCZ | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | -0.83 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.33 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than ARKB's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and ARKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -49.30% | -41.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | -49.30% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.70% | -46.55% | -33.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.71% | -15.94% | -57.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.70% | 28.24% | -2.54% |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a higher volatility of 18.63% compared to ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) at 9.72%. This indicates that BTCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.63% | 9.72% | +8.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.19% | 34.70% | +34.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.32% | 43.46% | +43.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.14% | 49.94% | +47.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.14% | 49.94% | +47.20% |
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKB's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. ARKB - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and ARKB have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to ARKB (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs ARKB's -49.30%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 42.88% vs -35.86% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 9.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 42.88% return vs -35.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.21% for ARKB.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and ARKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer