GARY vs. ROUS
GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GARY is actively managed, while ROUS is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
GARY vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than ROUS's 16.55% return.
GARY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
GARY vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.72% | 0.25% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARY and ROUS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARY vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
GARY
ROUS
GARY vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.42 | 0.67 | +3.75 |
Drawdowns
GARY vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -35.51% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -4.24% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
GARY vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARY | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 11.37% | +7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 14.38% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 16.96% | +2.29% |
GARY vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARY vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARY and ROUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: Mango and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.19% for ROUS.
Find the right allocation for GARY and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer