GARY vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GARY (Mango Growth ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GARY is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

GARY vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARY achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 16.16% return.

GARY

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 12.07%
• YTD: 30.72%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARY vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	30.72%	0.25%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GARY and ONEQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

GARY vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARY vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mango Growth ETF (GARY) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GARY	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.42	0.65	+3.77

Drawdowns

GARY vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARY drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARY and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GARY	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-55.09%	+44.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.85%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-7.95%	+6.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GARY	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.25%	16.05%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	22.14%	-2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	21.71%	-2.46%

GARY vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

GARY vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GARY and ONEQ in my portfolio?

GARY and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GARY or ONEQ?

On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GARY or ONEQ?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GARY or ONEQ?

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between GARY and ONEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Mango and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GARY and 0.21% for ONEQ.