GARP vs. QDEF
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index while QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 17.48%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for QDEF. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
GARP vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than QDEF's 10.48% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K |
GARP vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and QDEF is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GARP and QDEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
QDEF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
QDEF
Communication Services
GARP
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
QDEF
Financial Services
GARP
QDEF
Industrials
GARP
QDEF
Healthcare
GARP
QDEF
Energy
GARP
QDEF
Utilities
GARP
QDEF
Basic Materials
GARP
QDEF
Real Estate
GARP
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
QDEF
GARP vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.93 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 12.20 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum QDEF drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.74% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -6.95% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -14.43% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -21.37% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -0.58% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -3.27% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 1.67% | +2.08% |
Volatility
GARP vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.29%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 2.29% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 7.47% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 9.85% | +10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 13.77% | +8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 16.14% | +7.78% |
GARP vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than QDEF's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and QDEF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 12.34% for QDEF. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer