GARP vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index while FNGS tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 18.96%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

GARP vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

GARP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 36.11%
• 3Y*: 31.05%
• 5Y*: 18.96%
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF	16.96%	21.49%	37.42%	42.86%	-26.75%	27.99%	26.51%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	87.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and FNGS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020	0.84

The correlation between GARP and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

GARP vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GARP	FNGS
Technology	56.7%	59.9%
Communication Services	12.0%	28.8%
Financial Services	7.5%	10.0%
Industrials	6.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	11.3%
Healthcare	5.4%	-
Energy	2.7%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

GARP vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP

GARP Risk / Return Rank: 64
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GARP	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	0.79	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.19	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.15	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	0.75	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	2.12	+8.25

GARP vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GARP vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GARP	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-48.98%	+17.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	-22.93%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	-26.77%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.61%	-48.98%	+18.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-9.63%	+5.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-10.85%	+3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	8.05%	-4.56%

Volatility

GARP vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 7.61%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GARP	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	8.74%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.12%	17.19%	-2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	21.65%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.11%	30.10%	-7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.95%	31.17%	-7.22%

GARP vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

GARP vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF	0.26%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GARP and FNGS in my portfolio?

GARP and FNGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GARP or FNGS?

FNGS has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to GARP (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, GARP or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 18.96% for GARP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GARP or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 18.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GARP or FNGS?

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FNGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GARP or FNGS?

GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between GARP and FNGS?

GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.