GAMR vs. GERM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GAMR returned 19.82% vs 0.00% for GERM. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.

Performance

GAMR vs. GERM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GAMR

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 13.55%
• YTD: 3.68%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: -0.52%
• 10Y*: 12.82%

GERM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMR vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	3.68%	39.20%	9.02%
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

GAMR vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAMR	GERM
Technology	66.0%	-
Communication Services	25.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	99.3%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GAMR vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMR

GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 21
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMR vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAMR	GERM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAMR	GERM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and GERM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMR	GERM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	0.00%	-55.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	0.00%	-29.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.61%	0.00%	-13.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.13%	0.00%	-22.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	0.00%	+12.82%

Volatility

GAMR vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMR	GERM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	0.00%	+5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	0.00%	+17.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.32%	0.00%	+22.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.35%	0.00%	+24.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	0.00%	+24.27%

GAMR vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAMR vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	0.50%	0.52%	0.63%
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, GAMR or GERM?

GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs GERM's 0.00%.

Which ETF is better, GAMR or GERM?

On 1-year performance, GAMR leads with 19.82% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAMR or GERM?

Over the 1-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAMR or GERM?

GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAMR or GERM?

GAMR has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

What is the main difference between GAMR and GERM?

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while GERM is Health & Biotech Equities. GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.68% for GERM.