GAID vs. FID
GAID (Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. GAID is actively managed, while FID is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
GAID vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAID achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 9.96% return.
GAID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- 6M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GAID vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF | -1.34% | 0.04% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.96% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAID and FID is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAID vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
GAID
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FID
GAID vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAID vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAID drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAID and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -39.79% | +26.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | 0.00% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -8.38% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
GAID vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAID | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 10.17% | +5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 17.05% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 18.86% | -3.35% |
GAID vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAID vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
GAID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than FID's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.12% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAID and FID have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAID is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAID is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GAID and 0.60% for FID.
Find the right allocation for GAID and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer