GAA vs. VAMO
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria, while VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GAA returned 7.72%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for VAMO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.
Performance
GAA vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GAA has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 7.72%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.
GAA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
GAA vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 9.39% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 9.11% | 15.12% | -7.15% | 15.11% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 3.15% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | -4.92% | -4.63% | -11.43% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and VAMO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015 | 0.38 |
GAA vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GAA
VAMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
GAA
VAMO
Industrials
GAA
VAMO
Real Estate
GAA
VAMO
-
Energy
GAA
VAMO
Basic Materials
GAA
VAMO
Technology
GAA
VAMO
Consumer Cyclical
GAA
VAMO
Communication Services
GAA
VAMO
Utilities
GAA
VAMO
Consumer Defensive
GAA
VAMO
Healthcare
GAA
VAMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
VAMO
GAA vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAA | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.28 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 3.28 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.04 | 9.47 | +5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAA | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.63 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.47 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.31 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
GAA vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and VAMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -41.84% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -5.55% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | -11.61% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -17.25% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | -41.84% | +15.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -2.76% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -9.98% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.92% | -0.41% |
Volatility
GAA vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) is 2.60%, while Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that GAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.97% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | 7.66% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 11.19% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.28% | 17.34% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 18.09% | -7.00% |
GAA vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VAMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.59% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and VAMO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAMO has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to GAA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs VAMO's -41.84%.
On 10-year performance, GAA leads with 7.72% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GAA has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.
GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.
GAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VAMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.65% for VAMO.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAA and VAMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer