G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE
G2XJ.DE (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS) and ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - G2XJ.DE tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners while ESGP.DE tracks the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, G2XJ.DE returned 37.12%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for ESGP.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G2XJ.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -16.27% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.DE's 11.07% return.
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- 6M
- -23.82%
- YTD
- -16.27%
- 1Y
- 48.09%
- 3Y*
- 37.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | -16.27% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.11% | 4.02% |
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.07% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G2XJ.DE
ESGP.DE
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| G2XJ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.45 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 6.94 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2XJ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -20.50% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.81% | -6.31% | -30.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.81% | -20.50% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.61% | 0.00% | -35.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.33% | -5.23% | -20.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.11% | 2.23% | +13.88% |
Volatility
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 2.19%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G2XJ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.33% | 2.19% | +14.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.16% | 9.02% | +32.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.54% | 11.58% | +38.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 14.44% | +23.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.95% | 14.44% | +23.51% |
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
G2XJ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither G2XJ.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
G2XJ.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer