PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESGP.DE
HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF
5.10%5.79%12.94%2.10%-0.73%
APXJ.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.45%0.37%5.75%1.28%-6.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than APXJ.DE's 3.45% return.


ESGP.DE

1D
1.91%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
5.10%
6M
5.77%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10Y*

APXJ.DE

1D
2.19%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
3.45%
6M
2.60%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than APXJ.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGP.DE
ESGP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

APXJ.DE
APXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGP.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.43

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

0.68

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.10

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.72

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

2.56

+3.18

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the APXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGP.DE and APXJ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGP.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.43

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.07

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between ESGP.DE and APXJ.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESGP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APXJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.


TTM2025202420232022
ESGP.DE
HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APXJ.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.77%2.87%3.01%3.43%2.92%

Drawdowns

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum APXJ.DE drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and APXJ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGP.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-22.00%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.97%

-10.98%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-3.92%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-9.65%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.61%

-0.11%

Volatility

ESGP.DE vs. APXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 4.37%, while Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR Dist (APXJ.DE) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESGP.DEAPXJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

5.10%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

8.89%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

14.93%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

14.33%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

14.33%

+0.24%