G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L).
G2XJ.DE and XGLD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. G2XJ.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. XGLD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 15, 2010. Both G2XJ.DE and XGLD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | 9.81% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.09% | -15.55% | 18.76% | 43.18% | -8.98% | -10.97% |
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 12.44% | 45.07% | 34.18% | 9.97% | 5.94% | 2.98% | 13.88% | 21.02% | 3.27% | -2.05% |
Different Trading Currencies
G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR, while XGLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGLD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than XGLD.L's 12.44% return. Over the past 10 years, G2XJ.DE has outperformed XGLD.L with an annualized return of 17.93%, while XGLD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 8.31%
- 1M
- -15.24%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 32.05%
- 1Y
- 112.10%
- 3Y*
- 46.90%
- 5Y*
- 24.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.93%
XGLD.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 25.24%
- 1Y
- 42.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.92%
- 5Y*
- 22.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XGLD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
G2XJ.DE
XGLD.L
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G2XJ.DE | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.69 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.16 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 2.43 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 9.41 | +3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G2XJ.DE | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.69 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.38 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and XGLD.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither G2XJ.DE nor XGLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, which is greater than XGLD.L's maximum drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and XGLD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2XJ.DE | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -45.19% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -18.08% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | -21.06% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.96% | -21.21% | -28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.55% | -10.25% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.33% | -19.06% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.84% | 4.60% | +4.24% |
Volatility
G2XJ.DE vs. XGLD.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 20.01% compared to Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) at 12.53%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| G2XJ.DE | XGLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.01% | 12.53% | +7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.43% | 22.03% | +17.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.10% | 24.73% | +21.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.37% | 16.37% | +20.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 14.92% | +22.90% |