ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE).
ESGP.DE and IQQX.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGP.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 8, 2021. IQQX.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. Both ESGP.DE and IQQX.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 5.32% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 11.26% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 2.81% | 0.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than IQQX.DE's 11.26% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQX.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 32.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
IQQX.DE
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGP.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 2.22 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.73 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 6.01 | -3.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 22.52 | -13.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGP.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.22 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.21 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and IQQX.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison
ESGP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.18% | 3.64% | 4.84% | 5.36% | 6.66% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.88% |
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -69.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and IQQX.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -69.45% | +48.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -11.23% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -3.25% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -14.66% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.65% | +0.36% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 4.39%, while iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 4.88% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 8.46% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 14.60% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 12.97% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 15.84% | -1.27% |