PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, G2XJ.DE has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 12.60%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.48%
1Y
61.87%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%

SILJ

1D
0.27%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.27%
6M
17.87%
1Y
105.62%
3Y*
43.99%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%18.76%43.18%-8.98%-10.97%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
8.27%150.20%13.42%-8.05%-10.18%-17.46%22.04%60.61%-24.57%-17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and SILJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.67

The correlation between G2XJ.DE and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G2XJ.DESILJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.17

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

7.79

-2.72

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2XJ.DE and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G2XJ.DESILJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.00

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.34

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.22

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.11

+0.28

Drawdowns

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -74.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and SILJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2XJ.DESILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-74.59%

+24.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-33.46%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-33.46%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-49.98%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.96%

-69.87%

+19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.97%

-25.37%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-38.41%

+13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.16%

13.60%

-1.44%

Volatility

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) is 15.07%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2XJ.DESILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.07%

17.79%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.04%

43.46%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.48%

53.12%

-6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.98%

41.84%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.69%

44.16%

-6.47%

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2XJ.DE vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

G2XJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.87%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


G2XJ.DE and SILJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G2XJ.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2XJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

G2XJ.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILJ is Silver. G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.69% for SILJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and SILJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer