G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP
G2XJ.DE (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - G2XJ.DE is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, G2XJ.DE returned 9.31%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for SLVP. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. G2XJ.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2XJ.DE achieves a -4.54% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 1.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with G2XJ.DE having a 9.31% annualized return and SLVP not far behind at 9.20%.
G2XJ.DE
- 1D
- 8.61%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- 6M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -4.54%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.73%
SLVP
- 1D
- 7.02%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 85.81%
- 3Y*
- 51.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €1.92M | €2.07M | €3.05M | |
| €5.61M | €6.10M | €9.61M |
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | -4.54% | 149.58% | 21.45% | 3.64% | -6.11% | -15.53% | 18.76% | 43.16% | -8.98% | -10.97% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.33% | 166.91% | 22.03% | -5.24% | -12.98% | -17.81% | 43.55% | 40.82% | -18.44% | -8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and SLVP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015 | 0.69 |
The correlation between G2XJ.DE and SLVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
G2XJ.DE
SLVP
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| G2XJ.DE | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.35 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 4.72 | -1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.96%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2XJ.DE and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2XJ.DE | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.96% | -75.87% | +25.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.10% | -36.78% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.10% | -36.78% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.81% | -47.09% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.96% | -61.62% | +11.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.59% | -26.43% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -39.10% | +13.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.17% | 18.23% | -0.06% |
Volatility
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 15.15%. This indicates that G2XJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G2XJ.DE | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.29% | 15.15% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.32% | 40.92% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.18% | 54.83% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.42% | 41.28% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.10% | 40.52% | -2.42% |
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2XJ.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
G2XJ.DE vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
G2XJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2XJ.DE VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.07% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
G2XJ.DE and SLVP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.
G2XJ.DE is categorized as Gold, while SLVP is Silver. G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for G2XJ.DE and 0.39% for SLVP.
Find the right allocation for G2XJ.DE and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer