PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZROX vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZROX vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZROX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.95% return.


FZROX

1D
1.90%
1M
0.00%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.23%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.48%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZROX vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
9.14%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.95%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FZROX and LVHD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FZROX and LVHD has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZROX vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZROX vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZROXLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.16

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

5.43

+7.08

FZROX vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZROX and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZROX vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZROX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZROX and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZROXLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-37.32%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.17%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-14.29%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-16.75%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-1.07%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-4.04%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.46%

-0.49%

Volatility

FZROX vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that FZROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZROXLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

3.54%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

6.96%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

9.77%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

12.91%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

15.52%

+4.62%

FZROX vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZROX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZROX vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than LVHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.94%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZROX and LVHD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to LVHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZROX dropped -34.96% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZROX and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer