FZAFX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
FZAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | -9.30% | 14.68% | 18.15% | 35.80% | -24.36% | 23.09% | 43.86% | 35.68% | 0.36% | -0.34% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
FZAFX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- 13.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAFX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAFX
SWLGX
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.72 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 2.51 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.68 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAFX and SWLGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | 0.57% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 1.93% | 11.39% | 10.84% | 9.53% | 6.38% | 11.66% | 5.87% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.13% | -32.69% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -16.16% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.73% | -32.69% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.55% | -16.16% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -7.13% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 4.62% | -1.05% |
Volatility
FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 5.38% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 11.82% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.45% | 22.31% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 21.47% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 22.78% | -2.13% |