FZAFX vs. SWLGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FZAFX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FZAFX returned 11.32%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for SWLGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FZAFX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.

Performance

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 3.19% return.

FZAFX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 10.90%
• 1Y: 26.05%
• 3Y*: 19.50%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

SWLGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 19.96%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	12.14%	14.68%	18.15%	35.80%	-24.36%	23.09%	43.86%	35.68%	0.36%	-0.83%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	3.19%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and SWLGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017	0.97

The correlation between FZAFX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAFX

FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FZAFX	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.32	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.83	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	1.32	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	4.34	+3.66

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and SWLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZAFX	SWLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.13%	-32.69%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.55%	-16.16%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.19%	-23.30%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.73%	-32.69%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-5.34%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-7.04%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	4.91%	-1.52%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.91%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZAFX	SWLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.05%	5.91%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.02%	12.60%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.49%	16.21%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	21.61%	-0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.86%	22.68%	-1.82%

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZAFX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than SWLGX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	0.46%	0.51%	0.00%	0.48%	1.93%	11.39%	10.84%	9.53%	6.38%	11.66%	5.87%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.44%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZAFX and SWLGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FZAFX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FZAFX or SWLGX?

FZAFX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to SWLGX (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.