FZAFX vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FZAFX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX returned 18.27%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FZAFX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FZAFX having a 18.27% annualized return and SCHG not far ahead at 18.77%.

FZAFX

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 6.92%
• YTD: 15.05%
• 6M: 14.41%
• 1Y: 31.33%
• 3Y*: 21.27%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 18.27%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	15.05%	14.68%	18.15%	35.80%	-24.36%	23.09%	43.86%	35.68%	0.36%	35.37%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.96

The correlation between FZAFX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAFX

FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FZAFX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.60	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.18	+0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.28	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.51	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	5.04	+4.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FZAFX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.60	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.70	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.87	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.84	0.00

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZAFX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.13%	-34.59%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.55%	-16.41%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.19%	-23.39%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.73%	-34.59%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.13%	-34.59%	+3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.78%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-5.20%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	4.90%	-1.62%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZAFX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	3.61%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	11.62%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.35%	15.50%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	22.27%	-1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	21.55%	-0.79%

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZAFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z	0.45%	0.51%	0.00%	0.48%	1.93%	11.39%	10.84%	9.53%	6.38%	11.66%	5.87%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZAFX and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FZAFX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FZAFX or SCHG?

FZAFX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.