FZAFX vs. FDGRX

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly higher than FDGRX's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 9.85%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and FDGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FZAFX nor FDGRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and FDGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) at 10.14%. This indicates that FZAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.