PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAFX vs. FDGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 16.91%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.52% annualized return.


FZAFX

1D
2.82%
1M
-3.42%
6M
5.15%
YTD
6.27%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
16.91%
ALL TIME*
15.63%

FDGRX

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.50%
6M
12.24%
YTD
15.01%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
21.52%
ALL TIME*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
6.27%14.68%18.15%35.80%-24.36%23.09%43.86%35.68%0.36%35.37%
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
15.01%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%38.40%-4.14%36.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and FDGRX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.96

The correlation between FZAFX and FDGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZAFX
FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAFXFDGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.22

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.04

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

6.83

-3.97

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and FDGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAFXFDGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-71.62%

+40.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-12.60%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

-26.19%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

-40.25%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

-40.25%

+9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-7.06%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-15.86%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.74%

+0.11%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) have volatilities of 6.49% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAFXFDGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

6.23%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

15.89%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

20.62%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

24.26%

-3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

23.50%

-2.58%

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAFX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
0.48%0.51%0.00%0.48%1.93%11.39%10.84%9.53%6.38%11.66%5.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FZAFX and FDGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZAFX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to FDGRX (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAFX and FDGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer