FZAFX vs. FZAHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX).
FZAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FZAHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | -5.39% | 14.68% | 18.15% | 35.80% | -24.36% | 23.09% | 43.86% | 35.68% | 0.36% | 35.37% |
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | -9.46% | 22.61% | 39.23% | 45.70% | -38.18% | 11.74% | 69.25% | 40.80% | 15.25% | 35.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly higher than FZAHX's -9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has underperformed FZAHX with an annualized return of 16.19%, while FZAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.64% annualized return.
FZAFX
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
FZAHX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -8.34%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 19.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FZAHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAFX vs. FZAHX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAFX
FZAHX
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAFX | FZAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.53 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 5.41 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAFX | FZAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.34 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.78 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAFX and FZAHX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Dividend Comparison
FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than FZAHX's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAFX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z | 0.54% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 1.93% | 11.39% | 10.84% | 9.53% | 6.38% | 11.66% | 5.87% | 0.00% |
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | 3.98% | 3.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 5.15% | 3.74% | 11.00% | 7.50% | 14.42% | 10.52% |
Drawdowns
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum FZAHX drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and FZAHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAFX | FZAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.13% | -44.45% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -16.06% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.73% | -44.45% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.13% | -44.45% | +13.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.78% | -12.06% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -8.30% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 4.45% | -0.83% |
Volatility
FZAFX vs. FZAHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) is 7.78%, while Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that FZAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAFX | FZAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 8.51% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 14.81% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 24.42% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 24.88% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 23.82% | -3.12% |