PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYX vs. OMFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYX vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 14.58% return.


FYX

1D
0.65%
1M
1.45%
YTD
19.73%
6M
21.82%
1Y
47.95%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
12.42%

OMFS

1D
0.84%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.58%
6M
15.91%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYX vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
19.73%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%5.71%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
14.58%13.34%3.98%15.12%-17.29%28.60%15.02%27.12%-9.01%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FYX and OMFS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017

0.88

The correlation between FYX and OMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYX vs. OMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYX
OMFS

Financial Services

17.5%
24.3%

Industrials

15.9%
14.7%

Healthcare

14.3%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
8.4%

Technology

10.9%
14.2%

Real Estate

8.4%
12.2%

Energy

6.4%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.1%
1.1%

Utilities

1.6%
1.1%

Financial Services

FYX
17.5%
OMFS
24.3%

Industrials

FYX
15.9%
OMFS
14.7%

Healthcare

FYX
14.3%
OMFS
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FYX
11.7%
OMFS
8.4%

Technology

FYX
10.9%
OMFS
14.2%

Real Estate

FYX
8.4%
OMFS
12.2%

Energy

FYX
6.4%
OMFS
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

FYX
5.7%
OMFS
3.8%

Basic Materials

FYX
4.5%
OMFS
2.8%

Communication Services

FYX
3.1%
OMFS
1.1%

Utilities

FYX
1.6%
OMFS
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYX vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFS
OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYX vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYXOMFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.64

1.71

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.52

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

3.20

+3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.31

11.01

+9.30

FYX vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYX and OMFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYXOMFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.71

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.27

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

FYX vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than OMFS's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and OMFS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYXOMFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.80%

-42.50%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-9.38%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-22.35%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-29.22%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.16%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-10.49%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.72%

-0.38%

Volatility

FYX vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) is 4.60%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYXOMFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

5.00%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

12.43%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

17.62%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

21.46%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

24.31%

-0.10%

FYX vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYX vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than OMFS's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.68%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.91%0.80%1.87%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FYX and OMFS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OMFS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FYX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs OMFS's -42.50%.

On 5-year performance, FYX leads with 8.58% vs 5.80% for OMFS. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FYX has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

OMFS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.68% for FYX.

FYX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OMFS is Small Cap Value Equities. FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.39% for OMFS.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYX and OMFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer