FYX vs. OMFS
FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while OMFS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FYX returned 8.58%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for OMFS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for OMFS.
Performance
FYX vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 14.58% return.
FYX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 21.82%
- 1Y
- 47.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
OMFS
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 30.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FYX vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 19.73% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 19.48% | 21.32% | -10.64% | 5.71% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 14.58% | 13.34% | 3.98% | 15.12% | -17.29% | 28.60% | 15.02% | 27.12% | -9.01% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYX and OMFS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FYX and OMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYX vs. OMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYX
OMFS
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYX
OMFS
Industrials
FYX
OMFS
Healthcare
FYX
OMFS
Consumer Cyclical
FYX
OMFS
Technology
FYX
OMFS
Real Estate
FYX
OMFS
Energy
FYX
OMFS
Consumer Defensive
FYX
OMFS
Basic Materials
FYX
OMFS
Communication Services
FYX
OMFS
Utilities
FYX
OMFS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYX vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank
FYX
OMFS
FYX vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYX | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 1.71 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | 2.52 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.29 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 3.20 | +3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 11.01 | +9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYX | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 1.71 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.27 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FYX vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than OMFS's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and OMFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYX | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -42.50% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -9.38% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | -22.35% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -29.22% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.16% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -10.49% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.72% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FYX vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) is 4.60%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYX | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.00% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 12.43% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 17.62% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 21.46% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 24.31% | -0.10% |
FYX vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYX vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison
FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than OMFS's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.68% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.87% | 1.27% | 1.84% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FYX and OMFS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OMFS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FYX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs OMFS's -42.50%.
On 5-year performance, FYX leads with 8.58% vs 5.80% for OMFS. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FYX has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
OMFS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.68% for FYX.
FYX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OMFS is Small Cap Value Equities. FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.39% for OMFS.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYX and OMFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer