FYX vs. OMFS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while OMFS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FYX returned 10.51%/yr vs 7.25%/yr for OMFS. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FYX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for OMFS.

Performance

FYX vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 18.33% return.

FYX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: 18.67%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 1Y: 48.76%
• 3Y*: 18.62%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 12.59%
• ALL TIME*: 9.33%

OMFS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 11.99%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 12.70%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund	$4.00M	$3.55M	$3.84M
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	$494.23K	$429.77K	$649.60K

FYX vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund	25.97%	12.68%	12.22%	18.30%	-18.41%	27.43%	19.48%	21.32%	-10.64%	5.62%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	18.33%	13.34%	3.98%	15.12%	-17.29%	28.60%	15.02%	27.12%	-9.01%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FYX and OMFS is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017	0.88

The correlation between FYX and OMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYX vs. OMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYX	OMFS
Financial Services	17.4%	26.7%
Industrials	16.4%	11.0%
Healthcare	15.0%	15.1%
Technology	11.8%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	8.9%
Real Estate	8.6%	12.4%
Energy	5.1%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	3.5%
Communication Services	3.2%	1.2%
Utilities	1.6%	0.7%

Return for Risk

FYX vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FYX

FYX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 79
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FYX vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FYX	OMFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	1.74	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	2.59	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.30	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.10	3.29	+2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.46	11.43	+9.03

FYX vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYX and OMFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FYX vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than OMFS's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and OMFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYX	OMFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.80%	-42.50%	-19.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-9.38%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.91%	-22.35%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.91%	-29.22%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-2.10%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.80%	-10.31%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	2.70%	-0.45%

Volatility

FYX vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYX	OMFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	3.76%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.97%	12.21%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.93%	17.70%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.81%	21.22%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.15%	24.16%	-0.01%

FYX vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYX vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than OMFS's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund	0.90%	0.64%	1.62%	1.22%	0.95%	0.99%	0.65%	1.12%	1.08%	0.60%	0.94%	0.88%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.09%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYX and OMFS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FYX and OMFS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FYX or OMFS?

OMFS has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to FYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs OMFS's -42.50%.

Which ETF is better, FYX or OMFS?

On 5-year performance, FYX leads with 10.51% vs 7.25% for OMFS. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYX or OMFS?

Over the 5-year period, FYX has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYX or OMFS?

OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYX or OMFS?

OMFS has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.90% for FYX.

What is the main difference between FYX and OMFS?

FYX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OMFS is Small Cap Value Equities. FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.39% for OMFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.