PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYX vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYX vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 25.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FYX has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 13.06%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.


FYX

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.51%
YTD
22.94%
6M
20.86%
1Y
47.16%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
13.06%

FYC

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.13%
YTD
25.16%
6M
22.15%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
28.14%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYX vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
22.94%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%14.34%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.16%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FYX and FYC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.90

The correlation between FYX and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYX vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYX
FYC

Financial Services

17.3%
8.9%

Industrials

16.6%
18.7%

Healthcare

14.0%
25.3%

Technology

11.7%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
9.5%

Real Estate

8.6%
5.7%

Energy

5.7%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.7%

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Financial Services

FYX
17.3%
FYC
8.9%

Industrials

FYX
16.6%
FYC
18.7%

Healthcare

FYX
14.0%
FYC
25.3%

Technology

FYX
11.7%
FYC
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FYX
11.7%
FYC
9.5%

Real Estate

FYX
8.6%
FYC
5.7%

Energy

FYX
5.7%
FYC
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

FYX
5.3%
FYC
3.2%

Basic Materials

FYX
4.5%
FYC
3.7%

Communication Services

FYX
3.1%
FYC
3.7%

Utilities

FYX
1.6%
FYC
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYX vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYX vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYXFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

5.44

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.40

19.70

+0.70

FYX vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYX and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYX vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than FYC's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYXFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.80%

-47.85%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-10.48%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-27.79%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-35.37%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.82%

-47.85%

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.75%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-9.63%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.89%

-0.57%

Volatility

FYX vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) is 4.89%, while First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that FYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYXFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

7.00%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

15.77%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

21.65%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

23.73%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

24.61%

-0.41%

FYX vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYX vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than FYC's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.06%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.67%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FYX and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYC has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to FYX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 15.10% vs 13.06% for FYX. On fees, FYX is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 13.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYX is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

FYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.06% for FYC.

FYX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FYC is Small Cap Growth Equities. FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYX and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer