FYX vs. FNDA
FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index while FNDA tracks the Russell RAFI Small Company US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYX returned 12.27%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for FNDA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FYX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDA.
Performance
FYX vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYX achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FYX has outperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.
FYX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
FNDA
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
FYX vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 18.13% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 18.30% | -18.41% | 27.43% | 19.48% | 21.32% | -10.64% | 14.34% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 14.87% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYX and FNDA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FYX and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYX vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYX
FNDA
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYX
FNDA
Industrials
FYX
FNDA
Healthcare
FYX
FNDA
Consumer Cyclical
FYX
FNDA
Technology
FYX
FNDA
Real Estate
FYX
FNDA
Energy
FYX
FNDA
Consumer Defensive
FYX
FNDA
Basic Materials
FYX
FNDA
Communication Services
FYX
FNDA
Utilities
FYX
FNDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYX vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank
FYX
FNDA
FYX vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.82 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 2.63 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.80 | 3.32 | +2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.69 | 10.73 | +7.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.82 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FYX vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYX drawdown since its inception was -61.80%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYX and FNDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.80% | -44.64% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -9.36% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | -25.92% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -25.92% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.82% | -44.64% | -4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.01% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -6.69% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.89% | -0.55% |
Volatility
FYX vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) at 4.38%. This indicates that FYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.38% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 11.79% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 17.13% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 20.89% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 22.37% | +1.84% |
FYX vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYX vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
FYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FNDA's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.69% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FYX and FNDA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FNDA (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYX dropped -61.80% vs FNDA's -44.64%.
On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 12.27% vs 10.87% for FNDA. On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.69% for FYX.
FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index, while FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FYX and 0.25% for FNDA.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYX and FNDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer