PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYC vs. IJT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYC vs. IJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than IJT's 22.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FYC has outperformed IJT with an annualized return of 14.25%, while IJT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


FYC

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.71%
6M
17.96%
YTD
25.24%
1Y
51.84%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.25%

IJT

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.24%
6M
16.81%
YTD
22.61%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYC vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
25.24%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
22.61%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FYC and IJT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FYC and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYC vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYC
IJT

Healthcare

27.4%
14.7%

Industrials

17.4%
18.7%

Technology

17.2%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.7%

Financial Services

9.2%
13.5%

Real Estate

5.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.3%

Energy

2.1%
3.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

FYC
27.4%
IJT
14.7%

Industrials

FYC
17.4%
IJT
18.7%

Technology

FYC
17.2%
IJT
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FYC
9.4%
IJT
10.7%

Financial Services

FYC
9.2%
IJT
13.5%

Real Estate

FYC
5.5%
IJT
6.5%

Communication Services

FYC
3.9%
IJT
2.9%

Basic Materials

FYC
3.5%
IJT
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

FYC
3.0%
IJT
3.3%

Energy

FYC
2.1%
IJT
3.8%

Utilities

FYC
1.4%
IJT
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYC vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYC vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYCIJTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

3.10

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

10.77

+6.81

FYC vs. IJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the IJT Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYC and IJT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYC vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and IJT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYCIJTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-57.61%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-9.08%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-27.41%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

-29.24%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-42.03%

-5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.57%

-3.39%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-10.27%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.61%

+0.35%

Volatility

FYC vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 5.20%. This indicates that FYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYCIJTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

5.20%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.04%

13.07%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

17.93%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.75%

21.53%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

22.99%

+1.61%

FYC vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYC vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison

FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IJT's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.17%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.70%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FYC and IJT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYC has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to IJT (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs IJT's -57.61%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.25% vs 10.95% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.17% for FYC.

FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.18% for IJT.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYC and IJT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer