FXZ vs. SETM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index while SETM tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXZ returned 11.20%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for SETM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.

Performance

FXZ vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's 11.16% return.

FXZ

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 24.42%
• 6M: 22.36%
• 1Y: 44.84%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

SETM

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -8.14%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 95.17%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXZ vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	24.42%	16.25%	-16.31%	-1.97%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	11.16%	95.27%	-13.24%	-13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and SETM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.64

The correlation between FXZ and SETM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXZ	SETM
Basic Materials	76.9%	76.0%
Industrials	15.4%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	22.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXZ vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXZ

FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 61
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXZ vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXZ	SETM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.05	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.41	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	3.70	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	10.56	+2.52

FXZ vs. SETM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SETM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and SETM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and SETM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXZ	SETM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.46%	-42.81%	-22.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-25.85%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.99%	-42.81%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.23%	-19.00%	+13.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.33%	-15.03%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	9.04%	-5.60%

Volatility

FXZ vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 7.83%, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXZ	SETM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.83%	17.16%	-9.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.24%	37.55%	-20.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.77%	46.69%	-23.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.19%	37.23%	-13.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.93%	37.23%	-12.30%

FXZ vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXZ vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than SETM's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund	1.44%	1.74%	1.81%	1.97%	1.56%	1.11%	1.51%	1.58%	1.38%	1.01%	1.19%	1.26%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	1.41%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXZ and SETM in my portfolio?

FXZ and SETM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXZ or SETM?

SETM has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to FXZ (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs SETM's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, FXZ or SETM?

On 3-year performance, SETM leads with 25.14% vs 11.20% for FXZ. On fees, SETM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXZ or SETM?

Over the 3-year period, SETM has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXZ or SETM?

SETM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXZ or SETM?

FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.41% for SETM.

What is the main difference between FXZ and SETM?

FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.65% for SETM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.