FXZ vs. HOMZ
FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) are both Materials funds - FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index while HOMZ tracks the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXZ returned 7.84%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for HOMZ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HOMZ.
Performance
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 29.62% return, which is significantly higher than HOMZ's -3.23% return.
FXZ
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 29.62%
- 6M
- 33.34%
- 1Y
- 53.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
HOMZ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 29.62% | 16.25% | -16.31% | 16.27% | -0.92% | 30.84% | 22.52% | 7.90% |
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | -3.23% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and HOMZ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FXZ and HOMZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXZ
HOMZ
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
FXZ
HOMZ
Industrials
FXZ
HOMZ
Consumer Cyclical
FXZ
HOMZ
Communication Services
FXZ
-
HOMZ
Consumer Defensive
FXZ
-
HOMZ
Energy
FXZ
-
HOMZ
-
Financial Services
FXZ
-
HOMZ
Healthcare
FXZ
-
HOMZ
-
Real Estate
FXZ
-
HOMZ
Technology
FXZ
-
HOMZ
Utilities
FXZ
-
HOMZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXZ vs. HOMZ — Risk / Return Rank
FXZ
HOMZ
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXZ | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.06 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 0.29 | +3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 0.67 | +15.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXZ | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 0.25 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.16 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.42 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than HOMZ's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and HOMZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXZ | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -48.10% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -16.71% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.99% | -22.91% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -33.76% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -12.58% | +12.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -9.74% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 7.35% | -3.97% |
Volatility
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) at 5.34%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXZ | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 5.34% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 13.56% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 19.55% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 21.47% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 24.99% | -0.12% |
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than HOMZ's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXZ vs. HOMZ - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than HOMZ's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.38% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.74% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXZ and HOMZ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXZ has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to HOMZ (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs HOMZ's -48.10%.
On 5-year performance, FXZ leads with 7.84% vs 3.51% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXZ has performed better with a 7.84% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.38% for FXZ.
FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pettee Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.30% for HOMZ.
FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXZ and HOMZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer