PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HOMZ vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HOMZ vs. GDXJ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 4.28%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for GDXJ. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.

Performance

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -16.16% return.

HOMZ

1D
-0.52%
1M
-4.85%
6M
-1.65%
YTD
1.60%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
10.94%

GDXJ

1D
-3.69%
1M
-7.31%
6M
-23.13%
YTD
-16.16%
1Y
50.07%
3Y*
40.59%
5Y*
17.64%
10Y*
8.17%
ALL TIME*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

GDXJ

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
$446.17M$451.03M$619.88M

HOMZ

Hoya Capital Housing ETF
$171.58K$134.04K$166.00K

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HOMZ
Hoya Capital Housing ETF		1.60%2.72%9.49%36.49%-28.14%41.02%15.80%17.38%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF		-16.16%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HOMZ and GDXJ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019

0.23

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HOMZ
GDXJ

Real Estate

39.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

34.8%

-

Industrials

11.7%

-

Financial Services

9.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Technology

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

HOMZ
39.7%
GDXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

HOMZ
34.8%
GDXJ

-

Industrials

HOMZ
11.7%
GDXJ

-

Financial Services

HOMZ
9.5%
GDXJ
0.1%

Basic Materials

HOMZ
3.2%
GDXJ
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

HOMZ
0.8%
GDXJ

-

Technology

HOMZ
0.6%
GDXJ

-

Communication Services

HOMZ
0.5%
GDXJ

-

Energy

HOMZ

-

GDXJ

-

Healthcare

HOMZ

-

GDXJ

-

Utilities

HOMZ

-

GDXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hoya Capital Housing ETF

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF

Often compared with HOMZ:
HOMZ vs. XHBHOMZ vs. ITBHOMZ vs. FPROHOMZ vs. SPYHOMZ vs. VTIHOMZ vs. CDLHOMZ vs. COPX
Often compared with GDXJ:
GDXJ vs. GDXGDXJ vs. GLDGDXJ vs. SILJGDXJ vs. GOLDGDXJ vs. SPYGDXJ vs. GLDMGDXJ vs. IAU

Return for Risk

HOMZ vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
HOMZ
HOMZ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HOMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HOMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HOMZGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.32
0.97

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.65
1.45

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.19

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.26

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

2.68

-1.87

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOMZ and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and GDXJ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HOMZGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.10%

-88.66%

+40.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.71%

-41.32%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-41.32%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.76%

-48.79%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-57.77%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-38.93%

+30.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-60.26%

+50.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

19.42%

-11.60%

Volatility

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) is 5.98%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 14.90%. This indicates that HOMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HOMZGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

14.90%

-8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

44.56%

-29.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.92%

53.86%

-33.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

42.07%

-20.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

44.18%

-19.26%

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOMZ vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than GDXJ's 2.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF		2.78%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
HOMZ
Hoya Capital Housing ETF		2.66%2.54%2.13%2.08%2.03%1.21%3.18%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HOMZ and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to HOMZ (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

On 5-year performance, GDXJ leads with 17.64% vs 4.28% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 17.64% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.66% for HOMZ.

HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while GDXJ is Gold. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Hoya Capital and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOMZ and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer