FXZ vs. EART
FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - FXZ tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index while EART tracks the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXZ returned 13.07%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for EART. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EART.
Performance
FXZ vs. EART - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 29.62% return, which is significantly higher than EART's 17.65% return.
FXZ
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 29.62%
- 6M
- 33.34%
- 1Y
- 53.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
EART
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- 1Y
- 118.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXZ vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 29.62% | 16.25% | -16.31% | 16.27% | 7.09% |
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 17.65% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and EART is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FXZ and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXZ vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank
FXZ
EART
FXZ vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXZ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 4.59 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 14.55 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXZ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 3.15 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.27 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and EART.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXZ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -53.68% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -26.03% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.99% | -37.20% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -10.88% | +10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -29.15% | +17.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 8.19% | -4.81% |
Volatility
FXZ vs. EART - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 7.04%, while Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXZ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 11.14% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 31.37% | -14.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 37.95% | -16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 33.97% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 33.97% | -9.10% |
FXZ vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXZ vs. EART - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than EART's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.55% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.38% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXZ and EART have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EART has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to FXZ (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs EART's -53.68%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 21.75% vs 13.07% for FXZ. On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FXZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 21.75% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.
FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.55% for EART.
FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.59% for EART.
EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXZ and EART
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer