EART vs. REMX
EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - EART tracks the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index while REMX tracks the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EART returned 19.97%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for REMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EART vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 24.22% return.
EART
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 90.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 139.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
EART vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 8.19% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -17.92% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 24.22% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -24.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EART and REMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EART and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EART vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
EART
REMX
EART vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EART | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 6.01 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 15.83 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EART vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EART | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -90.20% | +36.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -23.35% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | -62.11% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -57.95% | +39.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.98% | -66.82% | +37.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 8.85% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EART vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) is 13.28%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that EART experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EART | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 16.71% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 37.35% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.51% | 49.97% | -10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 40.71% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 37.16% | -2.90% |
EART vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EART and REMX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EART vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than REMX's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.42% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EART and REMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to EART (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs REMX's -90.20%.
On 3-year performance, EART leads with 19.97% vs 5.61% for REMX. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EART has been the lower-risk option at 13.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 19.97% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EART and REMX have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.60% for EART.
EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EART and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer