PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXR vs. RBLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXR vs. RBLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than RBLD's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has outperformed RBLD with an annualized return of 12.94%, while RBLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.


FXR

1D
-0.02%
1M
-2.58%
6M
3.73%
YTD
10.82%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
12.94%
ALL TIME*
8.89%

RBLD

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.92%
6M
10.34%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.80M$2.32M$2.87M
$127.03K$1.03M$779.49K

FXR vs. RBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
10.82%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
16.81%13.99%17.94%19.36%-9.87%12.98%0.51%12.81%-21.72%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and RBLD is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2008

0.75

The correlation between FXR and RBLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXR vs. RBLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXR
RBLD

Industrials

67.3%
42.4%

Technology

11.5%
10.9%

Basic Materials

8.3%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Financial Services

4.5%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.6%
27.9%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

4.3%

Industrials

FXR
67.3%
RBLD
42.4%

Technology

FXR
11.5%
RBLD
10.9%

Basic Materials

FXR
8.3%
RBLD
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FXR
6.4%
RBLD

-

Financial Services

FXR
4.5%
RBLD

-

Healthcare

FXR
0.6%
RBLD

-

Utilities

FXR
0.6%
RBLD
27.9%

Communication Services

FXR

-

RBLD
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

FXR

-

RBLD

-

Energy

FXR

-

RBLD
8.3%

Real Estate

FXR

-

RBLD
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXR vs. RBLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXR vs. RBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXRRBLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.61

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

8.60

-5.17

FXR vs. RBLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the RBLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and RBLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXR vs. RBLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than RBLD's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and RBLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXRRBLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-50.07%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-7.19%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-19.14%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-22.54%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-50.07%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-4.12%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-10.76%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

2.18%

+2.23%

Volatility

FXR vs. RBLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) at 3.65%. This indicates that FXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXRRBLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.65%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

11.00%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

14.19%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

16.78%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

18.50%

+3.37%

FXR vs. RBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXR vs. RBLD - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than RBLD's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.66%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
0.97%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXR and RBLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXR has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to RBLD (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs RBLD's -50.07%.

On 10-year performance, FXR leads with 12.94% vs 8.19% for RBLD. On fees, FXR is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXR has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXR is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.66% for FXR.

FXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RBLD is Infrastructure Equities. FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXR and RBLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer