FXP vs. QTJL
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FXP is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FXP returned -30.22%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for QTJL. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
FXP vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.
FXP
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- -30.22%
- 5Y*
- -16.52%
- 10Y*
- -23.04%
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXP vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 13.64% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 35.69% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -30.16% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and QTJL is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
QTJL
FXP vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXP | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.42 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 3.08 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 16.23 | -16.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXP | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 2.06 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.52 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
FXP vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -33.40% | -66.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.21% | -6.68% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | -22.43% | -59.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -0.01% | -99.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.15% | -7.94% | -86.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.66% | 1.27% | +16.39% |
Volatility
FXP vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.06% | 0.31% | +14.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 7.61% | +21.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | 10.01% | +29.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.12% | 20.42% | +42.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.91% | 20.42% | +34.49% |
FXP vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXP vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.12% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and QTJL have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.20% vs -30.22% for FXP. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.20% return vs -30.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXP and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer