PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. NOIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than NOIEX's 12.69% return.


QTJL

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.57%
6M
2.72%
YTD
4.03%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.62%

NOIEX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.27%
6M
9.60%
YTD
12.69%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
13.67%
ALL TIME*
9.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$205.17K$322.53K$250.53K

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
4.03%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.36%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
12.69%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and NOIEX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.82

The correlation between QTJL and NOIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. NOIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTJLNOIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.68

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

11.45

-3.62

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the NOIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and NOIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum NOIEX drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and NOIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLNOIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-45.66%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.39%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-18.06%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-21.89%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-0.36%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-4.97%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.95%

-0.21%

Volatility

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) at 3.10%. This indicates that QTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTJLNOIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

3.10%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

9.48%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.49%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

16.42%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

17.99%

+2.31%

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NOIEX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTJL vs. NOIEX - Dividend Comparison

QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.19%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTJL and NOIEX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTJL has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to NOIEX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs NOIEX's -45.66%.

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTJL and NOIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer