FXP vs. FLCH
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - FXP tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%) while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXP returned -21.08%/yr vs -2.13%/yr for FLCH. Their -0.95 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
FXP vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -5.99% return.
FXP
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -1.26%
- 3Y*
- -27.96%
- 5Y*
- -21.08%
- 10Y*
- -22.22%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.45%
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- 0.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- -2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.47M | $4.17M | $3.23M | |
| $103.24K | $95.91K | $96.09K |
FXP vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 6.18% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -4.79% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.99% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and FLCH is -0.92, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | -0.95 |
The correlation between FXP and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
FLCH
FXP vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXP | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.01 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 0.02 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXP vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -62.09% | -37.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.65% | -21.48% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | -25.15% | -57.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | -50.38% | -37.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -33.73% | -66.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.18% | -30.63% | -63.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.62% | 10.31% | +1.31% |
Volatility
FXP vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.42%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 5.42% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.41% | 13.80% | +15.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.60% | 19.83% | +20.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.72% | 29.33% | +33.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.81% | 27.76% | +27.05% |
FXP vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXP vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than FLCH's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.30% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 3.39% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and FLCH have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to FLCH (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
On 5-year performance, FLCH leads with -2.13% vs -21.08% for FXP. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLCH has performed better with a -2.13% return vs -21.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.30% for FLCH.
FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.19% for FLCH.
FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXP and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer