FXP vs. CHIQ
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both China Equities funds - FXP tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%) while CHIQ tracks the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -22.22%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for CHIQ. Their -0.85 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.
Performance
FXP vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of -22.22%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return.
FXP
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -1.26%
- 3Y*
- -27.96%
- 5Y*
- -21.08%
- 10Y*
- -22.22%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.45%
CHIQ
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 13.46%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -11.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.64%
- 5Y*
- -8.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.03M | $735.04K | $809.72K | |
| $103.24K | $95.91K | $96.09K |
FXP vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 6.18% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -12.61% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and CHIQ is -0.85, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009 | -0.85 |
The correlation between FXP and CHIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
CHIQ
FXP vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXP | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.93 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.34 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -0.71 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXP vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than CHIQ's maximum drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and CHIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -67.04% | -32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.65% | -35.53% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | -35.53% | -46.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | -54.89% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.56% | -67.04% | -26.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -54.15% | -45.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.18% | -30.87% | -63.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.62% | 16.85% | -5.23% |
Volatility
FXP vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) at 6.69%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 6.69% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.41% | 16.64% | +12.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.60% | 23.16% | +17.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.72% | 37.29% | +25.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.81% | 32.47% | +22.34% |
FXP vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXP vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than CHIQ's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.54% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 3.39% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and CHIQ have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to CHIQ (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.32% vs -22.22% for FXP. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.32% return vs -22.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.54% for CHIQ.
FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.65% for CHIQ.
FXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXP and CHIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer