FXP vs. ASHX
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while ASHX is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.55, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASHX.
Performance
FXP vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXP
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- -30.22%
- 5Y*
- -16.52%
- 10Y*
- -23.04%
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXP vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 13.64% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | 20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and ASHX is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015 | -0.55 |
The correlation between FXP and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (10 years) to -0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
ASHX
FXP vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FXP vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.15% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.66% | — | — |
Volatility
FXP vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.12% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.91% | — | — |
FXP vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXP vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.12% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and ASHX have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.
FXP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASHX is China Equities. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.60% for ASHX.
Find the right allocation for FXP and ASHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer