PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXP vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXP vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FXP

1D
4.65%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.64%
6M
16.82%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-16.52%
10Y*
-23.04%

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXP vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
13.64%-45.32%-52.46%12.74%-11.73%23.56%-39.47%-29.01%12.45%-49.76%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-27.51%20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and ASHX is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015

-0.55

The correlation between FXP and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (10 years) to -0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXP vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXP vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXPASHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

FXP vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXPASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

Drawdowns

FXP vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXPASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.66%

Volatility

FXP vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXPASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.91%

FXP vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXP vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
4.12%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXP and ASHX have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

FXP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASHX is China Equities. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.60% for ASHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXP and ASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer