FXN vs. PXJ
FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FXN tracks the StrataQuant Energy Index while PXJ tracks the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXN returned 6.10%/yr vs -1.42%/yr for PXJ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXN charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.
Performance
FXN vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 36.33% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 48.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 6.10%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -1.42% annualized return.
FXN
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 36.33%
- 6M
- 30.66%
- 1Y
- 55.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
PXJ
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 48.10%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 87.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- -1.42%
FXN vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 36.33% | 3.39% | 0.27% | 0.97% | 46.92% | 51.79% | -19.91% | -6.76% | -24.79% | -5.02% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 48.10% | 8.74% | 0.21% | 14.44% | 62.25% | 11.28% | -44.31% | -0.32% | -39.82% | -23.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXN and PXJ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FXN and PXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXN vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXN
PXJ
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FXN
PXJ
Technology
FXN
PXJ
-
Basic Materials
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Communication Services
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Financial Services
FXN
-
PXJ
Healthcare
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Industrials
FXN
-
PXJ
Real Estate
FXN
-
PXJ
-
Utilities
FXN
-
PXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXN vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank
FXN
PXJ
FXN vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXN | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 8.68 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.26 | 25.04 | -11.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXN | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 3.34 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | -0.04 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.04 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FXN vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and PXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXN | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -94.82% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -10.10% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.69% | -40.03% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -40.03% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.63% | -87.72% | +7.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -66.16% | +62.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.98% | -55.67% | +17.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 3.49% | +0.68% |
Volatility
FXN vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) have volatilities of 7.52% and 7.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXN | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 7.91% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 18.32% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 26.29% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 34.57% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.99% | 39.47% | -4.48% |
FXN vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXN vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison
FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than PXJ's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1.76% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.09% | 2.28% | 0.87% | 4.71% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.05% | 2.36% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.18% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXN and PXJ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXJ has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to FXN (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs PXJ's -94.82%.
On 10-year performance, FXN leads with 6.10% vs -1.42% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXN has performed better with a 6.10% return vs -1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.
PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.76% for FXN.
FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.63% for PXJ.
PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXN and PXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer