PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXN vs. PXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXN vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXN achieves a 34.12% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 45.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FXN has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 6.54%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.40% annualized return.


FXN

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.88%
6M
23.33%
YTD
34.12%
1Y
45.83%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
6.54%
ALL TIME*
2.12%

PXJ

1D
-0.99%
1M
9.27%
6M
19.81%
YTD
45.40%
1Y
76.50%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
24.47%
10Y*
-0.40%
ALL TIME*
-1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.82M$9.25M$37.23M
$738.38K$1.21M$1.86M

FXN vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
34.12%3.39%0.27%0.97%46.92%51.79%-19.91%-6.76%-24.79%-5.02%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
45.40%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FXN and PXJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.88

The correlation between FXN and PXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXN vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXN
PXJ

Energy

90.0%
74.8%

Technology

5.0%

-

Financial Services

2.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

14.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

2.1%

Energy

FXN
90.0%
PXJ
74.8%

Technology

FXN
5.0%
PXJ

-

Financial Services

FXN
2.5%
PXJ
0.2%

Basic Materials

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Communication Services

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Healthcare

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Industrials

FXN

-

PXJ
14.7%

Real Estate

FXN

-

PXJ

-

Utilities

FXN

-

PXJ
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXN vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXN
FXN Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXN vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXNPXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

4.18

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

13.74

-5.16

FXN vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXN and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXN vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXN drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXN and PXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNPXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-94.82%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-18.39%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.69%

-40.03%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-40.03%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.63%

-87.72%

+7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-66.78%

+61.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.73%

-55.75%

+18.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

5.59%

-0.23%

Volatility

FXN vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) is 6.21%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that FXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNPXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

7.33%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

19.22%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.15%

26.06%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

34.16%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.80%

39.17%

-4.37%

FXN vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXN has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXN vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

FXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than PXJ's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
1.63%2.53%2.50%3.09%2.28%0.87%4.71%1.47%1.43%1.17%1.05%2.36%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.40%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXN and PXJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXJ has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to FXN (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXN dropped -87.39% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

On 10-year performance, FXN leads with 6.54% vs -0.40% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, FXN has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXN has performed better with a 6.54% return vs -0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXN.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.63% for FXN.

FXN tracks StrataQuant Energy Index, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXN and 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXN and PXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer