PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%-4.01%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and KNG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FXL and KNG has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FXL vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
KNG

Technology

88.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Industrials

4.5%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
5.5%

Financial Services

0.6%
12.7%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

FXL
88.1%
KNG
4.3%

Communication Services

FXL
5.9%
KNG

-

Industrials

FXL
4.5%
KNG
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
KNG
5.5%

Financial Services

FXL
0.6%
KNG
12.7%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

KNG
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

KNG
23.5%

Energy

FXL

-

KNG
3.0%

Healthcare

FXL

-

KNG
10.1%

Real Estate

FXL

-

KNG
4.4%

Utilities

FXL

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXLKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

0.87

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

2.25

+9.70

FXL vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXLKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

0.73

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.32

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

FXL vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-35.12%

-26.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-8.61%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-14.24%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-18.20%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-5.89%

+5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-4.13%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.32%

+0.71%

Volatility

FXL vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

2.29%

+5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

7.39%

+10.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

10.19%

+12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

13.59%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

17.18%

+8.10%

FXL vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and KNG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FXL leads with 13.48% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, FXL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FXL has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.75% for KNG.

FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer