PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXI vs. CNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXI vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed CNXT with an annualized return of 2.59%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.87% annualized return.


FXI

1D
-0.11%
1M
14.26%
6M
-6.22%
YTD
-4.06%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
2.59%
ALL TIME*
5.58%

CNXT

1D
-0.48%
1M
-16.02%
6M
4.07%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
55.74%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
4.87%
ALL TIME*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.48M$5.02M$7.74M
$711.55M$774.56M$979.33M

FXI vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-4.06%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF
8.75%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and CNXT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.58

The correlation between FXI and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXI vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXI
CNXT

Financial Services

35.2%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

25.3%
0.7%

Communication Services

17.8%
0.9%

Technology

5.9%
53.5%

Energy

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.5%

Industrials

2.8%
27.0%

Healthcare

2.6%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
1.8%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Financial Services

FXI
35.2%
CNXT
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FXI
25.3%
CNXT
0.7%

Communication Services

FXI
17.8%
CNXT
0.9%

Technology

FXI
5.9%
CNXT
53.5%

Energy

FXI
4.8%
CNXT

-

Basic Materials

FXI
3.4%
CNXT
4.5%

Industrials

FXI
2.8%
CNXT
27.0%

Healthcare

FXI
2.6%
CNXT
5.0%

Real Estate

FXI
1.0%
CNXT

-

Consumer Defensive

FXI
0.8%
CNXT
1.8%

Utilities

FXI
0.3%
CNXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXI vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXI vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXICNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.26

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

2.31

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

8.37

-8.29

FXI vs. CNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the CNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXI and CNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXI vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than CNXT's maximum drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and CNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXICNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-68.98%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.94%

-24.23%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-48.60%

+23.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.88%

-61.21%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

-63.30%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.45%

-23.73%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-42.49%

+11.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.03%

6.68%

+3.35%

Volatility

FXI vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 5.13%, while VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 16.11%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXICNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

16.11%

-10.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

28.24%

-13.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.27%

36.83%

-16.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.44%

36.10%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.61%

32.24%

-4.63%

FXI vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXI vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than CNXT's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF
0.17%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
1.86%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXI and CNXT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXT has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to FXI (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs CNXT's -68.98%.

On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 4.87% vs 2.59% for FXI. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 4.87% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.17% for CNXT.

FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while CNXT tracks ChiNext Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.65% for CNXT.

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXI and CNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer