FXI vs. CNXT
FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both China Equities funds - FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index while CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXI returned 1.84%/yr vs 5.41%/yr for CNXT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXI charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.
Performance
FXI vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -12.01% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed CNXT with an annualized return of 1.84%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.41% annualized return.
FXI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -17.10%
- YTD
- -12.01%
- 1Y
- -6.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
CNXT
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 1Y
- 79.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
FXI vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -12.01% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 20.68% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and CNXT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FXI and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXI vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXI
CNXT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FXI
CNXT
Consumer Cyclical
FXI
CNXT
Communication Services
FXI
CNXT
Technology
FXI
CNXT
Energy
FXI
CNXT
-
Basic Materials
FXI
CNXT
Industrials
FXI
CNXT
Healthcare
FXI
CNXT
Real Estate
FXI
CNXT
-
Consumer Defensive
FXI
CNXT
Utilities
FXI
CNXT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXI vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
FXI
CNXT
FXI vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 5.23 | -5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 17.67 | -18.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXI vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than CNXT's maximum drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and CNXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.68% | -68.98% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.94% | -15.37% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -48.60% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.44% | -61.21% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.81% | -63.30% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.71% | -15.37% | -15.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -42.61% | +11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 4.54% | +4.87% |
Volatility
FXI vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is 6.08%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 15.65%. This indicates that FXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXI | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 15.65% | -9.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 25.28% | -10.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 34.35% | -14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 35.85% | -4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 31.98% | -4.40% |
FXI vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXI vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than CNXT's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.03% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXI and CNXT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to FXI (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs CNXT's -68.98%.
On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 5.41% vs 1.84% for FXI. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 5.41% return vs 1.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.15% for CNXT.
FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.65% for CNXT.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXI and CNXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer