FXI vs. ASHR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).
FXI and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both FXI and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXI or ASHR.
Performance
FXI vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a 27.45% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 14.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed ASHR with an annualized return of -0.28%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.
FXI
27.45%
-3.81%
8.61%
20.09%
-3.69%
-0.28%
ASHR
14.81%
-0.51%
8.93%
10.71%
1.10%
3.23%
Key characteristics
| FXI | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.55 | 0.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.03 | 0.70 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.30 | 0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.79 | 1.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.91% | 9.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.29% | 30.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.68% | -51.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -39.67% | -38.14% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXI vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FXI and ASHR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXI vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXI vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than ASHR's 2.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.27% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% | 2.51% | 2.64% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.16% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXI vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXI vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) have volatilities of 10.50% and 10.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.