FXH vs. XLVI
FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. FXH is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXH charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
FXH vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's 4.44% return.
FXH
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
XLVI
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXH vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 7.37% | 13.63% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 4.44% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and XLVI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.76 |
FXH vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXH
XLVI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FXH
XLVI
Basic Materials
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Energy
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Financial Services
FXH
-
XLVI
Industrials
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Technology
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
FXH
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXH vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
FXH
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXH vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXH | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXH vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXH | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -8.14% | -35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -1.52% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -1.84% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility
FXH vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXH | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 10.96% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 10.96% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 10.96% | +7.52% |
FXH vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXH vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than XLVI's 12.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.84% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.10% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXH and XLVI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 12.10%, compared with 0.84% for FXH.
FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for FXH and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer