PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.20% return.


FXH

1D
1.48%
1M
1.65%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
7.03%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.68%10.16%0.96%-4.53%-12.24%15.20%28.00%22.26%0.16%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and KNG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.67

The correlation between FXH and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXH vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
KNG

Healthcare

100.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

12.7%

Industrials

-

20.3%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Technology

-

4.3%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Healthcare

FXH
100.0%
KNG
10.1%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

KNG
10.2%

Communication Services

FXH

-

KNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

KNG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

KNG
23.5%

Energy

FXH

-

KNG
3.0%

Financial Services

FXH

-

KNG
12.7%

Industrials

FXH

-

KNG
20.3%

Real Estate

FXH

-

KNG
4.4%

Technology

FXH

-

KNG
4.3%

Utilities

FXH

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXHKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.87

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

2.25

+1.08

FXH vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXHKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.73

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.32

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Drawdowns

FXH vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-35.12%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-8.61%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-14.24%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-18.20%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-5.89%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-4.13%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.32%

+0.67%

Volatility

FXH vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.29%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

7.39%

+3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

10.19%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

13.59%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

17.18%

+1.29%

FXH vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.85%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXH and KNG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXH has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 4.31% vs 0.56% for FXH. On fees, FXH is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXH is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.85% for FXH.

FXH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.75% for KNG.

FXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer