FXG vs. RSPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXG (First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FXG tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index while RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXG returned 4.23%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for RSPS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXG charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.

Performance

FXG vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXG achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than RSPS's 1.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXG having a 4.23% annualized return and RSPS not far behind at 4.15%.

FXG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: -2.29%
• 3Y*: 0.94%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 4.23%

RSPS

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: -1.56%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXG vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund	-0.18%	-2.66%	3.21%	1.97%	3.28%	21.73%	4.85%	20.65%	-11.49%	7.87%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	1.64%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FXG and RSPS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.82

The correlation between FXG and RSPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXG vs. RSPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FXG	RSPS
Consumer Defensive	79.9%	96.9%
Healthcare	8.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	3.1%
Industrials	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FXG vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXG

FXG Risk / Return Rank: 7
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 7
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXG vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FXG	RSPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	-0.12	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	-0.07	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.99	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	-0.13	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	-0.26	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXG vs. RSPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the RSPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXG and RSPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FXG	RSPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	-0.12	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	-0.00	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.28	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.57	-0.09

Drawdowns

FXG vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXG drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than RSPS's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXG and RSPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXG	RSPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.69%	-35.93%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-11.72%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.75%	-16.53%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.70%	-18.61%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.54%	-25.42%	-2.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.70%	-11.26%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-5.05%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.41%	6.13%	-0.72%

Volatility

FXG vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) is 3.20%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that FXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXG	RSPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.69%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	10.14%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	13.51%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.48%	13.60%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	14.87%	+0.05%

FXG vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXG vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison

FXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than RSPS's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXG First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund	2.90%	2.83%	1.70%	1.41%	1.83%	1.38%	1.41%	1.63%	2.31%	1.34%	1.72%	1.67%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.87%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXG and RSPS in my portfolio?

FXG and RSPS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXG or RSPS?

RSPS has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to FXG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXG dropped -38.69% vs RSPS's -35.93%.

Which ETF is better, FXG or RSPS?

On 10-year performance, FXG leads with 4.23% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXG or RSPS?

Over the 10-year period, FXG has performed better with a 4.23% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXG or RSPS?

RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXG or RSPS?

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.87% for RSPS.

What is the main difference between FXG and RSPS?

FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index, while RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXG and 0.40% for RSPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.